Document:Drug Consumption abstract

From AIDS Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
NOTWITHSTANDING ANY OTHER NOTICE ON THIS PAGE, the material on this page is NOT available under the GNU Free Documentation License; in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, it is posted in the manner of bulletin boards in schools and workplaces, to encourage public education and citizen awareness, without profit or payment, for persons and entities engaging in non-profit research and educational activities and purposes only.


AIDS Acquired by Drug Consumption and Other Noncontagious Risk Factors
Pharmacology & Therapeutics 55: 201–277, 1992
Abstract
by Peter Duesberg


Table of Contents
How To Use This Document


DuesbergJune87.jpg

The hypothesis that human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) is a new, sexually transmitted virus that causes AIDS has been entirely unproductive in terms of public health benefits. Moreover, it fails to predict the epidemiology of AIDS, the annual AIDS risk and the very heterogeneous AIDS diseases of infected persons. The correct hypothesis must explain why:


  1. AIDS includes 25 previously known diseases and two clinically and epidemiologically very different epidemics, one in America and Europe, the other in Africa;

  2. Almost all American (90%) and European (86%) AIDS patients are males over the age of 20, while African AIDS affects both sexes equally;

  3. The annual AIDS risks of infected babies, intravenous drug users, homosexuals who use aphrodisiacs, hemophiliacs and Africans vary over 100-fold;

  4. Many AIDS patients have diseases that do not depend on immunodeficiency, such as Kaposi’s sarcoma, lymphoma, dementia and wasting;

  5. The AIDS diseases of Americans (97%) and Europeans (87%) are predetermined by prior health risks, including long-term consumption of illicit recreational drugs, the antiviral drug AZT and congenital deficiencies like hemophilia, and those of Africans are Africa-specific.


Both negative and positive evidence shows that AIDS is not infectious:


  1. The virus hypothesis fails all conventional criteria of causation;

  2. Over 100-fold different AIDS risks in different risk groups show that HIV is not sufficient for AIDS;

  3. AIDS is only “acquired,” if at all, years after HIV is neutralized by antibodies;

  4. AIDS is new but HIV is a long-established, perinatally transmitted retrovirus;

  5. Alternative explanations disprove all assumptions and anecdotal cases cited in support of the virus hypothesis;

  6. All AIDS-defining diseases occur in matched risk groups, at the same rate, in the absence of HIV;

  7. There is no common, active microbe in all AIDS patients;

  8. AIDS manifests in unpredictable and unrelated diseases;

  9. It does not spread randomly between the sexes in America and Europe.


Based on numerous data documenting that drugs are necessary for HIV-positives and sufficient for HIV-negatives to develop AIDS diseases, it is proposed that all American/European AIDS diseases, that exceed their normal background, result from recreational and anti-HIV drugs. African AIDS is proposed to result from protein malnutrition, poor sanitation and subsequent parasitic infections. This hypothesis resolves all paradoxes of the virus-AIDS hypothesis. It is epidemiologically and experimentally testable and provides a rational basis for AIDS control.

Next chapter